These
are the footnotes for a
brief excerpt from Chapter 8 of
The Read-Aloud Handbook (Penguin, 2006,
6th edition).
Footnotes for CHAPTER
EIGHT
(Lessons from Oprah, Harry,
and the Internet)
-
Iris
C. Rotberg, (Ed.), Balancing Change and Tradition
in Global Education Reform (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education,
2004). Rotberg's book on education reform in 16 countries
showed that few other countries use testing in the
lower grades and almost none hold teachers accountable
for student grades. She wrote in Education Week, “[It
is] ironic because a major impetus for the testing
movement was our perception that other countries were
outperforming the United States in international test-score
comparisons. yet, in our attempt to be more like the
countries we most admire, we have adopted practices
that few of these countries use.” Iris C. Rotberg, "The
Bigger Picture: U.S. Education in a Global Context," Education
Week, Commentary, February 9, 2005.
-
(See Chapter
5 in the print edition of The
Read-Aloud Handbook (Penguin
2006).
-
D.
T. Max, “The
Oprah Effect,” The
New York Times Magazine, December 26, 1999, pp.
36–41.
-
-
“‘For it was indeed he,’” Fortune
Magazine, April 1934; also found in Only
Connect, Sheila
Egoff, G. T. Stubbs, and L. F. Ashley, eds. (New York:
Oxford University Press, 1969), pp. 41–61.
-
Catherine
Sheldrick Ross, “If
They Read Nancy Drew, So What? Series Book Readers
Talk Back,” Library and Information Science
Research (LISR) vol. 17, 1995, pp. 201–36.
This research won the American Library Association’s
research award in 1995. A shortened version appeared
in School Library Media Quarterly, Spring
1996, pp. 165–71.
-
Barbara
A. Bruschi and Richard J. Coley, “How Teachers Compare: The Prose,
Document, and Quantitative Skills of America’s Teachers,” ETS
Policy Information Center (Princeton, NJ: Educational
Testing Service, March 1999). Available on the Web
at www.ets.org/research/pic/compare.html.
-
G. Robert Carlsen and
Anne Sherrill, Voices of Readers:
How We Come to Love Books (Urbana, IL: National
Council of Teachers of English, 1988).
-
Joel
Achenbach, "Search
for Tomorrow," The
Washington Post, February 15, 2004, p. D1.
-
Nate
Stulman, “The Great
Campus Goof-Off Machine,” The
New York Times, May 15, 1999, Op-ed page.
-
Paul
Attewell, Belkis Suazo-Garcia, and Juan Battle, "Computers
and Young Children: Social Benefit or Social Problem?" Social
Forces, September 2003.
-
"Computers and Student
Learning: Bivariate and Multivariate Evidence on the
Availability and Use of Computers at Home and at School," Thomas
Fuchs and Ludger Woessmann, researchers at the University
of Munich, CESifo Working Paper No. 1321, November
2004, online at: http://www.cesifo.de/~DocCIDL/cesifo1_wp1321.pdf
-
Ian
Austen, “The Case
of the Flickering Pixels,” The
New York Times, February 3, 2000, pp. D1, D9.
-
Catherine
Greenman, “Printed
Page Beats PC Screen for Reading, Study Finds,” The
New York Times, August 10, 2000, p. E11.
-
Quoted
in Robert Darnton, “The New Age of the Book,” New
York Review, March 18, 1999, p. 5.
-
June
Kronholz , “PowerPoint Goes to School,” The
Wall St. Journal, November 12, 2002, pp. B1, B6.
-
Kevin
Stevens,"Incoming:
Two Sides of PowerPoint," The
New York Times, letter to the technology section, June
7, 2001, p. E6.
-
Eric R. Kandel, James H. Schwartz,
and Thomas M. Jessell, editors, Principles of
Neural Science, Third Edition, Center for Neurobiology
and Behavior, College of Physicians & Surgeons
of Columbia University and the Howard Hughes Medical
Institute (Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange, 1991). “The
visual system is the most complex of all the sensory
systems. The auditory nerve contains about 30,000
fibers, but the optic nerve (visual) contains one
million, more than all the dorsal root fibers entering
the entire spinal cord!”
 Footnotes
by chapter — 1 2 3 5 7 8 9 |
|